The trademark battle between Campus Activewear and Campus Sutra has entered a new phase at the Delhi High Court, drawing increased attention to brand identity and consumer confusion. The court is now set to examine whether the standalone use of “Campus” infringes on the established rights of Campus Activewear. The case underscores the growing importance of trademark protection for established brands. The key concern is that this usage could confuse consumers, leading them to believe the products are associated with Campus Activewear — potentially harming the brand’s reputation and the trust it has built over time. However, the case involves multiple layers that merit closer examination.
Why Is the Word ‘Campus’ at the Center of This Legal Clash?
Tensions started when Campus Activewear saw that some of Campus Sutra’s products were listed online using just the name “Campus,” which could easily confuse customers. At the same time, Campus Sutra has been around since 2012 and is widely recognized by
its full brand name; the use of “Campus” on its own raised concerns. Campus Activewear argued that this could mislead shoppers, blurring the lines between two distinct brands operating in similar fashion spaces.
On July 15, 2025, Campus Activewear initiated legal proceedings against Campus Sutra in the Delhi High Court, with Justice Amit Bansal presiding over the case. The company claimed that Campus Sutra was using the word “Campus” alone in some product listings, which could confuse customers and affect the brand name that they had worked hard to build.
Read Also: Delhi High Court Ordered to Lava Deposite 20.81 Crore in Patent Dispute Case
What Makes Campus Activewear and Campus Sutra Stand Out from Each Other?
Campus Activewear, established in 2006, is a prominent Indian brand specializing in sports and athleisure footwear, widely recognized by its use of the name “CAMPUS.” In contrast, Campus Sutra, founded in 2012, is a fashion-forward clothing label known for its trendy, youth-centric apparel, sold primarily through online platforms under the full brand name “Campus Sutra.” Despite operating in different product categories, a trademark conflict emerged after Campus Sutra was found using “Campus” alone in certain listings.
The company admitted the oversight, clarified it was unintentional, and took corrective action. The dispute underscores how overlapping brand elements—even in distinct markets—can lead to legal friction.
What Did the Delhi High Court Say in the Campus vs. Campus Sutra Case?
On July 15, 2025, a 30-day deadline was set by the court for Campus Sutra to submit its reply. Campus Sutra admitted that a few of their product listings had mistakenly used the word “Campus” alone and stated that it was not intentional. They assured the court that the issue had been fixed and promised not to use “Campus” by itself going forward.
Justice Amit Bansal acknowledged Campus Activewear’s concern about possible customer confusion and accepted Campus Sutra’s written assurance. The next hearing is scheduled for November 10, 2025, where the court will consider Campus Activewear’s request for temporary protection while the case is ongoing.
What’s Next in the Campus Trademark Battle?
There are a few possible outcomes that could unfold as the case progresses. Some of them include
- Next Hearing on November 10, 2025
At the upcoming hearing, the Delhi High Court will assess whether temporary protection should be granted to Campus Activewear while the trademark dispute is ongoing. - Trademark Validity Under Review
The Delhi High Court will closely examine whether Campus Activewear holds enforceable rights over the standalone use of the word “Campus” as a trademark. - Chance of Out-of-Court Settlement
Both brands may explore resolving the issue through mediation.
How Intellectual Property Rights Protect Brand Identity
- Trademark Protection:
Campus Activewear is enforcing its trademark rights over the word “Campus” to protect its brand identity. - Prevention of Consumer Confusion:
The case highlights IPR’s role in stopping the misleading use of brand names that could confuse buyers. - Brand Value Safeguarding:
Campus Activewear is using IPR to defend the reputation and market trust it has built over time.
Conclusion:
The Campus Activewear vs. Campus Sutra case highlights the importance of IPR in protecting brand identity and preventing market confusion. As the dispute unfolds, it underscores how trademark laws serve as a critical tool for businesses to safeguard their reputation and ensure fair competition.
Read Also: Trademark Agent Exam 2026 Registration Last Date | Syllabus | Eligibility