In a landmark ruling that further defines India’s intellectual property laws, in Yatra Online vs Mach Conferences case the Delhi High Court declared that the word “Yatra” is a generic expression and cannot be exclusively claimed as a trademark. Yatra Online Limited, a travel booking platform, tried to prevent Mach Conferences & Events Limited—a company focused on MICE services—from using the names BookMyYatra and BookMyYatra.com. The court, however, rejected Yatra Online’s petition, noting that “Yatra” is a common descriptive word for travel and therefore does not qualify for trademark protection. If you want to know more about the case and want to know what the Indian IPR laws say in this case, keep reading.
Delhi HC Trademark Dispute: How the Yatra Case Started
The trademark dispute began when Yatra Online Limited, one of India’s biggest online travel booking platforms, filed a case against Mach Conferences & Events Limited. The conflict arose because Mach was using the word “Yatra” in its services through names such as BookMyYatra and BookMyYatra.com. Yatra Online objected to this usage and sought to stop Mach from doing so, arguing that it had infringed upon Yatra’s trademark rights over the word “Yatra.”
Yatra Online filed the case in December 2024, challenging Mach Conferences’ use of the word “Yatra.” The matter first came up for hearing on 29 January 2025, and both sides were asked to finish submitting their arguments by 23 April 2025.
In its lawsuit, Yatra Online Limited argued that it held trademark rights over the word “Yatra” and that Mach Conferences’ use of names like BookMyYatra and BookMyYatra.com amounted to trademark infringement. Yatra claimed this could confuse customers, harm its brand identity, and give Mach an unfair advantage by riding on Yatra’s reputation.
What the Court Decided in the Yatra Online vs Mach Conferences Dispute
The case officially began when Yatra Online Limited filed its lawsuit against Mach Conferences & Events Limited. After hearings in early 2025, the matter finally reached a conclusion on 22 August 2025, when the Delhi High Court delivered its ruling. And in the final judgement, they gave some reasons to deny the demand of the yatra.
- The court said generic or common words cannot be monopolized under trademark law.
- It emphasized that trademark protection is only for distinctive and unique marks, not everyday language.
- Granting Yatra Online exclusive rights over “Yatra” would have restricted fair competition in the travel sector.
- Such a monopoly would also stop other businesses from using a word that is essential to describe travel services.
Read Also: Aprilia RS-GP 2025: New Patents Show Advanced Design and Racing Technology
How IPR Worked in the Yatra Online vs Mach Conferences Dispute
Yatra Online relied on its IPR under trademark law, arguing that it had exclusive rights over the word “Yatra” because it was part of its registered brand identity.
The Delhi High Court clarified that IPR protections, like trademarks, apply only to distinctive and unique marks. Generic or descriptive words (like Yatra, meaning travel) cannot be monopolized, even if a company has registered them.
The court explained that the purpose of IPR is to protect creativity and distinctiveness, not to allow businesses to block the use of common language that competitors also need to describe their services.
By rejecting Yatra’s claim, the court showed that IPR has limits—you can protect your brand identity, but you cannot claim ownership of a generic word that belongs to everyone.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s ruling makes it clear that while Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protect brand distinctiveness, they cannot be stretched to cover generic words like “Yatra”. This decision can be the future of the trademark law and shape how the world works in real life.
Read Also: Ultrahuman Takes Oura to Delhi High Court in Smart Ring Patent