A U.S. judge has rejected a lawsuit from the tech company Metabyte against Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram. The judge said that Meta’s name does not break any trademark rules and is different enough from Metabyte’s. Metabyte, which has been around since the 1990s, argued that Meta’s new name could hurt its brand and confuse people. The company also said Meta’s big online presence would make it harder for the smaller businesses to be noticed. But to understand this Metabyte vs Meta lawsuit, keep reading.
Metabyte vs. Meta: Full Case Background Explained
This case started in 2023, when Metabyte, a small tech company in California, filed a lawsuit against Meta. The issue began in 2021, when Facebook rebranded the company identity and changed its name to Meta. The new name quickly became popular, and people began using “Meta” to refer to Facebook and Instagram as well. Metabyte claimed that Meta’s name was too similar to its own and filed a trademark infringement case, arguing that it could confuse people. The company also raised concerns that because Meta (formerly Facebook) is such a huge global brand, its use of a similar name would make it difficult for a much smaller company like Metabyte to maintain its own identity and recognition in the market. But the case took a new turn when it reached the U.S. federal court in California. Judge Vince Chhabria reviewed the lawsuit and later the request for an appeal.
Read Also: Delhi HC Hears Parle Agro vs PepsiCo Trademark Dispute on Use of ‘Fizz’ in 7Up Packaging
Why the U.S. Court Rejected Metabyte’s Appeal Against Meta Trademark
The case was heard in a U.S. federal court in California by Judge Vince Chhabria. After reviewing the arguments, the judge ruled in August 2025 that Meta did not infringe on Metabyte’s trademark.
The court said:
- The names “Meta” and “Metabyte” are different enough.
- The two companies work in different areas of technology.
- There was no real proof that people were confused between the two.
He also noted that the decision was “not a close call,” meaning the case was clearly in Meta’s favor.
How Metabyte Reacted After the Court Rejected Its Case Against Meta
After the court rejected the case, Metabyte said it was unhappy with the decision.
- The company felt it was unfair for small businesses, since they struggle to protect their names against giants like Meta.
- CEO Manu Mehta said Metabyte has used its name since the 1990s, long before Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021.
- He warned that letting a big company use a similar name could make it hard for smaller firms to be noticed.
- Metabyte said it may try to appeal again, but admitted the fight would be difficult and expensive.
Conclusion
In the end, the court’s decision was a clear win for Meta, allowing it to keep its name without restrictions. For Metabyte, the outcome was disappointing, as it highlighted the struggle smaller companies face when challenging global giants. Whether Metabyte will appeal further or move on remains uncertain, but for now, Meta’s brand stands firm.
Read Also: PM Modi Calls for R&D and Patents to Transform India’s Pharma Sector