The Delhi High Court has once again made headlines in India, this time for bringing an end to one of the long-running trademark battles in recent years. In a significant development, the court has closed the case between Nestlé, the maker of Maggi noodles, and a utensil manufacturer using the name “Maggisun.” This Maggi vs Maggisun Trademark Case serves as a clear example of how trademark disputes can become serious business concerns and how legal battles in intellectual property don’t always unfold as they appear. The closure came after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement. To understand the details and implications of this case, keep reading.
Why Did Nestlé File a Trademark Case Against Maggisun?
To understand this Maggi vs Maggisun Trademark Case better, we first need to look at its roots. The dispute dates back to 2018, when the utensil manufacturer had started using the brand name “Maggisun” for its range of kitchen products, including pressure cookers and other cookware. Nestlé, the global food giant and owner of the beloved Maggi noodles brand, is a household favorite across India. And they did not like this act at all. Nestlé argued that this name was deceptively similar to “Maggi” and could mislead consumers while taking unfair advantage of the brand’s long-standing reputation and goodwill, and filed a trademark infringement case against Shankeshwar Utensils & Appliances Pvt. Ltd.
Nestlé chose the Delhi High Court because it has jurisdiction over major intellectual property (IP) matters in India and is known for handling high-profile trademark cases involving global brands. In its lawsuit, Nestlé’s main demands focused on protecting its brand identity and preventing consumer confusion. The company sought the following legal remedies:
- Nestlé wanted the utensil maker to stop using the name “Maggisun.”
- It asked the court to ban the use of any name or mark similar to “Maggi.”
- The company demanded that all existing products, labels, and packaging with “Maggisun” be destroyed.
- It asked for the cancellation of the trademark registration for “Maggisun.”
- Nestlé wanted the utensil maker to officially recognize “Maggi” as Nestlé’s trademark.
- It also sought compensation for damages and legal costs.
What Was the Settlement In The Maggi vs Maggisun Trademark Case?
Unlike most court battles that end with a judgment, this case concluded on a different note. After nearly seven years of legal back-and-forth, the long-running trademark dispute between Nestlé and Shankeshwar Utensils & Appliances Pvt. Ltd. came to a close in September 2025, when both sides chose to settle the matter out of court.
As part of the agreement:
- The utensil manufacturer acknowledged that “Maggi” is Nestlé’s trademark and agreed to stop using the name “Maggisun” or any similar mark that might confuse consumers.
- The company also pledged to destroy all existing products, packaging, and labels carrying the “Maggisun” name and provide proof of destruction to Nestlé.
- Additionally, it agreed to withdraw its trademark registration for “Maggisun” and refrain from using any similar name in the future—whether in advertising, online listings, or product branding.
- In return, Nestlé agreed to withdraw all further legal claims, marking a peaceful end to the dispute.
Conclusion
The Maggi vs Maggisun trademark case highlights how important trademark protection is in today’s competitive market. For companies like Nestlé, defending their brand is not just about reputation — it’s about preserving decades of trust, recognition, and consumer loyalty. The Delhi High Court’s approval of the settlement shows that even long legal disputes can be resolved responsibly when both sides choose cooperation over conflict.