Another major trademark dispute has reached the Delhi High Court, and this time it concerns the beloved 90s cult classic Andaz Apna Apna. The film gifted Indian audiences some of the most iconic characters, dialogues, and scenes—many of which still live on today through memes and pop culture references. However, the Andaz Apna Apna trademark case isn’t just about nostalgia; it deals with the unauthorized commercial use of the film’s title, characters, and even AI-generated content based on it. But what exactly is the case about, and can someone really stop the public from using such a classic in popular culture? If you want to know, keep reading.
Why Did Andaz Apna Apna Land in a Trademark Battle at the Delhi High Court?
To really understand this case, we need to go back to where it all began. Andaz Apna Apna first hit the screens in 1994, bringing together a star-studded cast—Salman Khan, Aamir Khan, Raveena Tandon, Karisma Kapoor, Shakti Kapoor, Johnny Lever, and many more—who made the film a true gem. Over time, it gifted us unforgettable characters like Amar, Prem, Teja, and the one and only Crime Master Gogo. If you’ve grown up watching Bollywood or scrolling memes, you’ve surely heard iconic lines like “Teja main hoon, mark idhar hai” or “Aap purush hi nahi, mahaapurush hain”.
Though it wasn’t a huge hit on release, the film slowly turned into a cult classic and became a permanent part of Indian pop culture. Recognizing its value, the producer’s company Vinay Pictures decided to legally protect it. The title Andaz Apna Apna was first trademarked in 2012, with additional registrations added in 2023 to broaden the protection—not just for films, but also for merchandise and other uses. After this, the makers of the film filed the case in the Delhi HC for trademark infringement.
Read Also: Trademark Clash Over ‘Kawach vs Kavach’: Delhi HC Asks Ambuja & JSW to Seek Amicable Settlement
Why Did Delhi HC Grant a Temporary Injunction in the Andaz Apna Apna Dispute?
On May 14, 2025, Vinay Pictures—the makers of Andaz Apna Apna—filed a case against more than 30 parties. These included:
- E-commerce platforms like Flipkart, Meesho, Etsy, and Desertcart are used for selling infringing merchandise.
- Google/YouTube for hosting Shorts and videos using the film’s IP without permission.
- GoDaddy for allowing domain names linked to the movie.
- Several John Doe defendants (unknown sellers, creators, and online entities misusing the film’s content).
After hearing the matter, the Delhi High Court passed a temporary injunction in May 2025, restraining unauthorized use of the film’s title, characters, and content.
The Court gave several reasons for this order:
- The title Andaz Apna Apna is a registered trademark, and unauthorized use amounts to infringement.
- Selling merchandise and using the film’s name/characters online dilutes and tarnishes its brand value.
- Recreating dialogues, characters, or scenes—even through AI-generated content—was held to be copyright infringement.
- The Court clarified this wasn’t harmless fandom but commercial exploitation of the film’s goodwill.
- Continued misuse could cause irreparable harm to the producer’s rights and reputation.
- The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, making protection necessary.
- Intermediaries like YouTube, Flipkart, and GoDaddy have a duty to block, delist, and take down infringing content.
What Is the IPR Significance of the Andaz Apna Apna Trademark Case?
The Andaz Apna Apna trademark case highlights how Indian courts are broadening intellectual property rights (IPR) protection to cover film titles, characters, dialogues, and even AI-generated content. The Delhi HC treated unauthorized merchandise, memes, and digital content as trademark and copyright infringement, stressing that this wasn’t fandom but commercial exploitation. Similar rulings have been seen before—like the Sholay case (2017), where the court protected the title and characters, and the Rajinikanth case (2015), which upheld personality rights. Globally, too, studios like Disney and Warner Bros. strictly guard characters like Mickey Mouse and Harry Potter, showing how iconic films are protected as brands in themselves.
Conclusion
The Andaz Apna Apna trademark case shows how even decades-old films can spark fresh legal battles in the digital era. By protecting its title, characters, and dialogues, the Delhi High Court has reinforced that iconic movies are more than just entertainment—they are valuable intellectual property. As streaming, e-commerce, and AI continue to grow, this ruling sends a strong message: classic films and their legacies deserve the same legal respect as modern blockbusters.
Read Also: Copyright Infringement vs Fair Use: Definitions, Examples, and Legal Guide