Actor and producer Ravi Mohan, known for his work in South Indian cinema, has landed in serious legal trouble over the title of his upcoming film. Ravi Mohan trademark case The matter has now reached the Delhi High Court, which turned the excitement for the movie announcement into a trademark dispute. While the film’s title initially generated buzz and excitement among fans, it has also triggered controversy after a Delhi-based company claimed ownership of the name. This unexpected legal challenge has created major hurdles for both the film and its producer. Keep reading to learn more about the case and the reasons behind this high-profile courtroom clash.
How Did This Ravi Mohan trademark case start with Indospirit over the ‘Bro Code’ Title?
To understand this case better, it’s important to look at how it all began and where it originated. The dispute dates back to 2015, when Indospirit Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a Delhi-based liquor manufacturer, launched its popular alcoholic beverage under the name BROCODE. The company registered the word as a trademark Infringement, and slowly built a strong market presence and brand identity around it. The trademark dispute began in 2025, when South Indian actor and producer Ravi Mohan announced his upcoming Tamil film titled Bro Code. But according to trademark law, once a term or phrase is registered, no other individual or company can use it for commercial purposes without permission from the trademark holder. Soon after the film’s title announcement, Indospirit Beverages filed a lawsuit against both Ravi Mohan and his production company, claiming that the film’s title infringed on their registered trademark and could mislead consumers into believing that the movie was connected to or endorsed by their beverage brand.
This marked the start of a high-profile legal battle that has since drawn widespread attention in both the film and legal industries. In response, Ravi Mohan Studios Pvt. Ltd. stated that the film’s title, Bar Code, was created independently and had already been registered under copyright for entertainment purposes. The production team also claimed that the dispute shot up after the beverage company allegedly asked for product placement of its drink in the movie, but the studio rejected the deal.
Read Also: Delhi High Court Confirms Mars–Cadbury Settlement, Ending 25-Year ‘Celebrations’ Trademark Fight
How Did the Delhi High Court Rule in the Ravi Mohan vs Indospirit ‘Bro Code’ Case?
After the case was filed, the Delhi High Court took the matter seriously and issued a temporary order in favor of the beverage company, Indospirit Beverages Pvt. Ltd., which owns the trademark BROCODE. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court noted that Indospirit had been using the BROCODE brand since 2015 and had already established strong market recognition and goodwill around the name. The court observed that the film’s title, Bro Code, was identical or deceptively similar to the company’s registered trademark. It further stated that using the same name for a movie could dilute the brand’s value, harm its reputation, and mislead consumers into believing the film was associated with the beverage company.
As a result, on October 27, 2025, the Delhi High Court issued a temporary injunction, stopping Ravi Mohan Studios from using the title “Bro Code” or any similar name until further orders. However, the court clarified that this order does not prevent the production company from continuing work on the film — it only restricts the use and promotion of the disputed title.
If we talk about what will happen next, the next hearing in the case is scheduled for December 23, 2025, when the court will review the matter in greater detail and decide whether the temporary injunction should be made permanent.
Conclusion
The Ravi Mohan Bro Code case highlights the growing importance of trademark protection in the entertainment industry. The Delhi High Court’s decision shows that even film titles must respect existing brand rights to avoid legal complications. As the case moves toward its next hearing, its outcome could set an important precedent for how intellectual property laws apply to creative works and brand names in India’s film industry.
Read Also: Ant Group Files ‘AntCoin’ Trademark in Hong Kong and UK, Signaling Stablecoin Ambitions